Posts Tagged ‘Illegal Immigration’
When The White House addressed last week the conspiracy theory accusations that a member of the President’s Secret Service detail was a shape shifting being of some alien race, which should easily have been explained away be saying the agent was a burn victim, or some other reasonable explanation, the radicals at The White House used the same methods of drama as we see in typical public education strategies where higher taxes are the aim. For those curious to see the video for yourself, it can be seen by CLICKING HERE. It says a lot about the Obama White House when people are looking so far into conspiracy in order to discover the truth behind this modern American president. Even so, the response by The White House regarding the footage of the strange Secret Service agent prompted this response:
The White House dismissed the alien bodyguards as too costly in this era of budgetary austerity. “I can’t confirm the claims made in this video, but any alleged program to guard the president with aliens or robots would likely have to be scaled back or eliminated in the sequester,” Caitlin Hayden, the chief spokeswoman for the National Security Council, e-mails Danger Room. “I’d refer you to the Secret Service or Area 51 for more details.”
Obviously a smart assed answer in response to a hoard of speculative theories thrown in Obama’s direction, but the attempt to connect it to the sequester cuts is particularly telling. For those who have been mystified in the past when public schools have illogically cut busing from children and made sports programs pay for play along with other extortive measures it is even more interesting to see the exact same types of strategies utilized in regard to the sequester cuts. The sequester at the federal level amounts to nothing in regard to the debt or deficit in America. CLICK HERE FOR PERSPECTIVE. The cuts coming from it are hardly a blip on the radar, yet it has soaked up nearly all the talk by big government supporters who are kicking and screaming about the very minor cuts in nearly an identical fashion that public schools use to wrestle more tax money off the backs of property owners. CLICK HERE to review my personal situation at Lakota where the public school in my district cut busing after their second levy defeat.
The White House in response to the sequester cuts has been toying with other highly visible social inconvenience measures so to convince the public that they need tax increases to keep the government growing, just like public schools do. Isn’t that amazing? It never occurred to anybody that the federal worker may be making too much money, which currently stands at a $130,000 average in compensation. Instead The White House chose to cut self-guided tours in The White House itself taking a page out of the book of Saul Alinsky to manipulate the public with nuisance, stating:
“Due to staffing reductions resulting from sequestration, we regret to inform you that White House Tours will be canceled effective Saturday, March 9, 2013 until further notice. Unfortunately, we will not be able to reschedule affected tours,” the White House said in an email.
These strategies are endemic with anything involving government. The employees of government cannot be trusted to manage their affairs properly and if left alone, they chose to give themselves outrageous raises off the public dime. There are very few jobs in the federal government worth six figures, yet it’s the average. It is no wonder that the Washington D.C. area is one of the richest in the world as far as real estate values. Its entire economy is built off the looted money of the American tax payer for jobs that have little, if any value. When it comes time to engage in management of their financial resources as is customary in anything involving payroll, the federal government chooses to cut White House tours, blame Marine accidents on lack of funding, and even jokes that the Alien Secret Service program has been cut because tax payers don’t want to fork over any more money.
The compensation level with all government positions is never analyzed, just as they aren’t in public schools. It is just assumed that wage levels will never be an issue. No wonder so many people are willing to work for big government, and support big government politicians—because the pay is so outrageously high. There are no management mechanisms in place to keep the wage levels reasonable in government because virtually everyone is ripping off the system. And when they get caught, they chose radicalism over logic as seen in the belly aching over sequestration cuts. The behavioral characteristics are common from the local school all the way to The White House and at every level in between.
Why should any American have to pay for sports fees at their school because teachers refuse to have a “normal” salary? Why should Americans have to be denied access to their house because Secret Service agents had to be cut due to sequester? With the tax rates that Americans currently pay for virtually everything why should it be acceptable to ask for more money so that an average compensation package of $130,000 can be maintained for federal employees? Yet, it is expected by all members of government from the school teacher to the President himself, that taxes should be raised so that federal workers can continue to live in a fantasy land of employment compensation where they almost always tend to vote in a representative republic for the elected candidate who supports more government expansion, higher wages for meaningless jobs, and will cancel the alien Secret Service details before asking overpaid federal workers to take a hair cut of 30% to 50% of their compensation packages to bring the value of their jobs back to reality.
The very fact that the government doesn’t expect to be managed says everything. They expect run away budgets and tax increases to constantly flow in their direction as though the American people should live in slavery to the level of comfort the federal employee enjoys. And when taxes are not increased and cuts are demanded, like children the first thing the government does is attempt to close National Parks, White House tours and training supplies to soldiers in the same fashion that public schools cut sports, busing, and band electives. All government workers are using the same radical handbook to make their case for outrageous salaries, and ever-growing government with no accountability at all to reality. And they expect it audaciously by making jokes as though everyone outside the Beltway should understand. Instead of offering a reasonable explanation for the alien looking agent discussed The White House chose to make fun of those who were left to speculation, and blamed their explanation on the sequestration not wasting even that opportunity to promote their radical behavior. The situation we are left with is a dire one, where the eventual management that must come will be painful as Americans appear to have finally hit their limit leaving the greedy federal employees who have never been told “NO” to wonder what to do next, as their lives have been constructed upon an eroding beach and their jobs are in a sand castle that is being whipped about by an encroaching tide. By the time the tide recedes, there won’t be much left standing so the pain for the federal worker is just getting under way. The scam is no longer working……………thankfully. But the time for painless management of tax payer resources has already passed when the first thing that goes are things the public truly values teaching them to despise the entire system, like what has been happening in public education all across the country as those thresholds have been reached.
One of the great themes of this site is to highlight the many ways that progressives have attacked traditional American culture. Progressives have an intense desire to wean Americans away from all forms of self-reliance so that national collectivism and addiction to government services are provoked. This has never been more evident than in relation to The Second Amendment of The United States Constitution. In the good ol’ days when a criminal nut-case broke into a home to steal a loaf of bread and was shot dead by the homeowner on the front porch of their property, the sheriff might come out—make a record of the case while enjoying some corn whisky brewed from a room in the back of the home. The homeowner would be treated respectfully and with honor and the assumption of guilt would be placed squarely on the character lying on the porch stiffening up due to rigor mortis. However, not any more—as progressives have seeped like viral insects into every aspect of American culture, legal, media, education, elected office, etc. The homeowner shooting intruders on their property have become saturated with panicky analysis and over-zealot gun grabbing politicians who want to build careers off their suffering. Progressives directly and indirectly have destroyed the very concept of individual rights in America for which The Second Amendment seeks to protect. In 2013 if a homeowner shoots a criminal nut case on their front porch the homeowner will be arrested aggressively and thrown into the back of a police car. Their computers and personal possessions will be confiscated and scrutinized and the property held by the state until prosecution of the shooter is concluded. The shooter will be charged with murder as the attacker wasn’t inside the home. The situation will be made worse when it is discussed that the attacker was only armed with a knife deeming no immediate threat to the homeowner who could have avoided opening the door and hoped the attacker would move away on their own. Progressive groups would then attack the homeowner in court through testimony stating that the attacker was simply hungry because they lost their job and needed food. Media outlets will then broadcast the story all over America about how the attacker had a “collective right” to the possessions of the homeowner and that if the shooter had only been willing to share his assets with the attacker both would be alive and free today saving the tax payers hundreds of thousands of dollars in court costs. When the frustrated defendant proclaims on the stand that “it’s not fair that a nut-case trying to attack their private property had more rights than they did,” the prosecuting attorney would simply respond, “how do you know the slain victim was a nut case? Are you a psychologist? Where did you study? What degree do you hold that enables you to proclaim that the victim was a so-called nut-case? These are the kind of things only professions are qualified to answer.” This is why George Lang along with a fistful of other patriots has started a new legal group called Second Call Defense.
In fact that was George Lang playing the hypothetical role of a homeowner defending his property from an attacker. In the video several examples were given about real life tragedies where the homeowner used a gun to defend their life yet found themselves in financial ruin because of the legal aftermath where parasitic entities sought to capitalize off progressive gun legislation that is entirely too aggressive. Lang knows a lot from an insider’s track about how the legal system can be just as much of a parasite attacking personal liberty as an intruder in a home. He is a trustee of West Chester Twp, in Ohio where the community pays its police department better wages than any place else from Pittsburg to Indianapolis. George has seen firsthand many cases similar to the example above cross his desk not just in his home town but all across America. This is the primary reason that Lang and his group have teamed up with The Buckeye Firearms Foundation to offer gun owners, supporters of The Second Amendment, and property owners’ legal help through Second Call Defense. They also offer preventative measures against the progressive encroachment of a legal system gone mad.
Progressives wish to believe that government has all the answers and can 100% of the time be relied upon to correct social debaucheries. Do-gooder politicians like Senator Diane Feinstein have built their careers injecting their progressive beliefs into every tragedy that strategically seeks to focus legal analysis away from individual liberty toward collective salvation. For well over 100 years now this gradual eroding of personal liberty has shifted the focus of behavioral studies away from any form of property ownership toward collective necessity. In court shooters will be grilled on the stand as to “how did they knew the attacker was a threat if they were simply on the porch and not brandishing a knife?” The burden of proof falls on the homeowner and not the dead victim as progressive legal interpretations have given the attacker the right to do as they please on the homeowner’s front porch. The homeowner has an obligation to call the “authorities” who will then inject themselves into the business of the homeowner and supersede their authority on their own property. To the progressive, the issue is not about guns, or the rights of the shooter, or even the dead body on the porch—the real villain is their hatred of private property and a sinister desire to erase the concept of it from the minds of Americans.
Yet, even if the homeowner called the authorities, there is no guarantee that they will act honorably and in the best interest of the caller. As George Lang knows all too well, the cops sometimes find that they are not too far away from the decrepit mind of an attacker and are all too tempted to abuse their power at the expense of the homeowner. Lang had to participate recently in a West Chester Township financial settlement where over-zealous young cops seemingly hungry to prove their manhood beat an un-armed drunk after a fight at a late night sports bar. The drunk wasn’t even part of the fight that had occurred much earlier but was simply the last person left on the scene. The cops wanted to exert their authority on someone abusing the man beating him senseless. Even with video evidence telling the story convincingly the superiors sided with the officers proving beyond doubt that in a court of law, the drunk had little chance of defending himself as all the cops had their stories aligned. It was when a grand jury examined the case that Lang realized the cops were in the wrong and the decision had to be made to pay the victim in a settlement to avoid further financial detriment to the community because of the police mistake. CLICK HERE TO SEE MORE ON THE STORY WITH VIDEO. So even if the cops are called to save the property of a homeowner, there is no way to know what type of officer might show up in a police car these days in a society that values deception over honor.
Second Call Defense was created to provide some help with these types of gun related cases. Once an attacker decides they want whatever it is that a property owner has, only one threat has been contained if the property owner uses a gun to stop that threat. From there an entire legal system of progressive activists, deal making politicians, morally deficient law enforcement, and presiding family members who may not have cared one ounce for the life of the defeated attacker, but in death through civil lawsuits and the promise of easy money the life of a typical scum-bag suddenly becomes worth a king’s ransom. A shooter protecting their property in 2013 America not only must protect themselves from attackers in the middle of the night as shown in the video above, but from the legal parasites who wish to make their careers off the backs of tragedy which is often the real threat. It is that second threat that Second Call Defense seeks to protect its members from. No other organization offers such a service in all of America. Second Call Defense offers training and education on legal firearm use, emergency resources such as a 24/7 legal hotline and upfront cash for attorney retainers and bonds. Insurance coverage for criminal and civil protection that is backed by the NRA endorsed insurance program is also offered. Most people can’t afford to put up thousands of dollars to get up to $10,000 upfront for an attorney retainer, immediate cash for a bond up to $250,000, up to $500 per day in wage compensation while in court, up to 40 sessions of psychological support, and up to $250,000 accidental shooting protection, $50,000 criminal defense reimbursement, unlimited civil suit defense protection, and $250,000 civil suit damages protection. Second Call Defense does all this and more. The first defense is in the property owner defending their life with a firearm. The second defense is from the parasites who seek to make livings off the misery left in the wake. From those, a gun cannot protect anyone. But now there is a group that can, Second Call Defense.
For more about Second Call Defense check out their website:
John Stossel and Ann Coulter had a wonderful debate recently in front of a group of college Libertarians in Washington D.C. over the nature of personal liberty. During the debate Coulter told John and the audience that Libertarians were a bunch of pussies for pandering to liberals with a social message of drug use and gay marriage. I normally agree with much of what Stossel, Judge Napolitano, and Glenn Beck who are all declared Libertarians state, but in this debate seen below, I am on the side of Ann Coulter 100%. I personally deplore drug use of any kind, and that includes over-the-counter medicine. I would never use marijuana as an ingested smoke into my lungs under any circumstance. I resist even taking aspirin or drinking alcohol. I think anyone who drinks alcohol to get drunk is an absolute fool. I have ended long-standing friendships over drug use and even abuse of alcohol, so I have no tolerance for it among the general population. Even in my teenage years where such behavior was expected, and I lived a life from 16 to 18 years old that would fill encyclopedia volumes with wild adventures, I had a sign in my car that indicated that no smoking was allowed. And it wasn’t…………for anybody. I have even thrown people out of my car for lighting up cigarette in the back seat while I was driving. I have no tolerance for drug or alcohol abuse and I have always been that way. So like Ann Coulter, my biggest problem with modern Libertarians is their permissiveness of drug use and the name of their movement, which is way too close to the word “liberal.” So I do not identify myself as a Libertarian. The barrier for me is their permissiveness of social debaucheries behind a flag of liberty.
The question that arises from Libertarians is how can government control what goes on in the bedroom of citizens, or dictate what an individual puts into their bodies? For me, government can’t, and shouldn’t be in the business of social behavioral regulation. That type of thing would normally be regulated to the spiritual pursuits of an individual which would create the goals people strive to live within. This would work fine if people shared similar values, such as a majority of the population wished to live by Christen values or Buddhist ideas, but in the absence of such social conviction there is a kind of free-for-all mentality that causes some to impose their freedoms on others who don’t share their values. So a law is necessary under those conditions, and a penalty for that law must be swift so it is respected by the public as a shared value.
For instance, if I’m in line at Kings Island, a popular amusement park in Southern Ohio and there is a guy in front of me smoking a marijuana cigarette, he is making a decision based on his personal liberty to impose upon me the expelled air from his lungs that contain within it chemicals I do not want in my body. Currently the law protects him from me, because I cannot just go up and knock his face into another dimension as he imposed upon me the marijuana smoke from his lungs. Because using drugs in public is illegal, the conflict is averted, where it wouldn’t be if marijuana use in public were legalized. There is nothing more disgusting than such public displays where the careless use of intoxicants can be seen coming out of the mouth of an individual and the only way you can prevent yourself from ingesting it yourself is to hold your breath. Such a thing is nearly as disgusting as seeing discarded cigarettes on the ground of a parking lot, or walkway that has been saturated with rain and are smashed flat. When in a public place I am always cautious to avoid stepping on them because I don’t want to drag that trash into my car, or my home as the old cigarette might become lodged into the tread of my shoes to fall out within my property littering it. I am just as cautious about looking for places in public that people have spit on the ground. I do not want to step in the spittle of some other person and drag their chemical intoxicants into the carpet of my vehicle on the way home. The rights of liberty from the person who spit on the sidewalk do not supersede my rights to maintain my property free of their discarded saliva, or cigarettes.
With liberty comes responsibility and if the social trends of the day leaned in the direction of social valor, then I might embrace the Libertarian designation a bit more amiably. I have no desire to visit the city of Amsterdam because of their loose drug laws, and now that Colorado has passed legislation legalizing pot, I may never visit that state in the years to come. The very idea of a body of people who collectively wish to participate in detrimental drug use is disgusting, and changes the way I view the entire state. I find the tendency to use drugs even for bi-polar disorders to be deplorable. I would like to see the human spirit overcome shortcomings and illnesses in the most self-reliant fashion possible—and I don’t see the Libertarian political movement going in that direction. Instead, it appears to be a happy middle place between what the Republicans once stood for, and what the hippie liberals promote actively–human weakness.
I hate more laws, and encourage breaking unjust laws as the situations dictate. The ultimate question is who decides what good and proper social behavior is—is it the Republicans, Democrats, or Libertarians? The answer is in none of them. Before the kind of freedom that Libertarians are striving for can ever occur the human race has to have a desire to behave with quality. They have to want to live quality lives and to respect the quality of other peoples’ lives. Without a firm definition of quality and what makes one thing better than another one persons freedom becomes another person’s hell. Without a spiritual bonding agent that is shared between one group of people and another, freedoms will collide and impose on unwarranted victims the pursuits of less stable personalities and their flaws.
The argument between Ann and John above is the direction that I see America going. As for the liberals, the Democrats, the communists and socialists of collectivism, I don’t even recognize them as having a seat at the table of tomorrow. I see them as having the same kind of living quality as any other animal on Earth. They live, eat and die in predictable fashions but are governed through their lives by animal instincts, the desire to have sex, consume food, and sleep. Without a personal commitment to any higher thoughts or causes, they are no different to me than an average household pet—and they will lose their standing all together in the future of America between the pot-headed Libertarians and Republicans like Ann Coulter who are trying to return the party back to the ideas it was founded on. As for me, no political party represents my thoughts best but the old Anti-Federalist Party of Thomas Jefferson. All these new political variations are lacking an inherit wisdom that is governed by personal valor. Without a human desire to be good, all the laws and political posturing of any collective group of individuals is a worthless pursuit that lacks sustainability. So long as Libertarians embrace drug use of any kind, I will never have an “L” next to my name in any professional or casual reference. I’ll stay with Independent—which is what the aim of all politics should be.
To understand what Agenda 21 is, the people who designed it for the United Nations with an aim of one world government, and what it will look like in the future implemented from cities like Hong Kong to Cincinnati, Ohio all you need to do is visit the birth place of it in Rio de Janeiro where the Earth Summit is routinely held. Agenda 21 was created in the minds of European socialists while attending one of these Earth Summits as far back as 1992, but in reality percolated in the minds of collectivist oriented governments for decades, since the words of Karl Marx first touched their minds nearly a century and a half ago. The Earth Summit has been routinely held in exotic cities like Rio and Cancun, Mexico to enamor the participants with familiar culture and high-minded thinking while topless women and string bikinis fill the sights and sounds of visitors with equatorial delight. Both Rio and Cancun are examples of what the future of the world will look like if left to Agenda 21. Both cities are filled with delightfully luxurious hotels and tourist accommodations while they are surrounded by extreme slums of people stacked upon each other in an inhumane fashion of compressed living and diabolical concessions to the human soul. These cities are true glimpses of what the future of human civilization will look like under Agenda 21 globally. Everything looks wonderful in the tourist areas, but for the workers who maintain the cities of Rio and Cancun—life sucks—big time. Listening to Bob Silliman who is the coordinator of Ohio’s Agenda 21 awareness efforts I thought of a visit my wife and I made fairly recently to Cancun where the United Nations often holds their Climate Change Conferences and saw the future of my own community in the vision plans of local Agenda 21 planners.
At the end of Bob’s speech many in the audience contemplated what the end game was for Agenda 21, and why it was even being implemented. Many speculated generally that it was power that was the intention—but as the young lady who stood up at the end declared, even if radical environmental leftists like George Soros wanted to use Agenda 21 to gain power over massive municipalities of people he would be long dead by the time Agenda 21 takes full hold in America—leaving the question mostly unanswered. The menacing answer is much more severe and difficult to comprehend. The people from the United Nations who fly in to participate in the Earth Summits and Climate Change Conferences in places like Cancun and Rio see the glitter of tourism and exotic locations and find themselves enchanted by the beauty of the Earth. Often they don’t travel too far from their hotels so they don’t see the massive slums that the people who live and work in those exotic cities contend with. For proof of these summit locations check the links below.
When my wife and I visited Cancun we were both astonished at the terrible living conditions of the residents just outside of the main strip in Cancun. Even more shocking was the massive shopping mall like complex just down the road from the airport that held a multiplex of strip houses and sex shops. The entire complex was one giant sex store that was reeking with human trafficking from young girls stolen from their families all over the world. It made the sex store at Exit 141 in Tennessee just a few miles from Knoxville look small. In the city of Cancun, Mexico if you head into the interior of the country within ten miles of the major hotels, once you pass the shopping mall of gentlemen clubs there is nothing for many dozens of miles, and for hundreds of miles in the Yucatan, there are only a few villages—many of them still containing thatched roofs the way a primitive might inhabit. As my wife saw this for the first time after growing up in America and living all of her life in upper class conditions, she was absolutely aghast and wanted to help the poor Mexican people. But the social conditions and politics of Mexico have imprisoned those poor residents of Cancun to be run by corrupt drug lords and the mobs who own all the hotels. The government is run by the mobs, and this is what the United Nations is selling in Agenda 21.
In Mexico and Brazil the residents have been pushed through regulation and policy into the cities to live like rats under the command of central planners. The living areas of these cities are terrible, and to call them slums would be a credit. They are the result of the well intended global climate United Nations sympathizers who think they can contain the human spirit in a bottle to preserve the Earth from global warming. Their intention of putting the human being in a bottle and holding them there so that green space thrives can be seen in Cancun. Mexico has lots of green space…………..lots and lots………….and LOTS of it. After traveling for a few days around the Yucatan Peninsula after being accustom to travel in America, my wife and I enjoyed a Big Mac at the McDonalds outside of our hotel like it was a feast at one of Chef Ramsey’s restaurants. In fact, a Big Mac never tasted so good and my wife and I decided in that McDonalds in Cancun on Kukulcan Blvd that we would commit ourselves to saving America from United Nations global planners. In America when we travel from Cincinnati to Louisville, or Cincinnati to Lexington, or Cincinnati to Columbus there is a lot of farm land that is being used productively, there is a lot of wonderful green space, and the Earth’s beauty is easy to see. If there is one reason to go after Agenda 21 it is to preserve the Big Mac. When I want a Big Mac, I can get one about every 20 miles no matter where I go in America—and that is a BEAUTIFUL thing. Savor the moment—take a deep breath……………ahhhhhh…………capitalism. Capitalism=Big Mac. Two very wonderful ideas.
No place in the world has it so lucky as I do in The United States, and I would love to see places like Mexico, Brazil, and the entire continent of Africa have a life as good as I have it in Cincinnati, Ohio and that means a McDonalds every twenty miles and cell phone service uninterrupted for thousands of miles. But they won’t get it with Agenda 21. Instead, Agenda 21 and the United Nations architects wish to take from me these wonderful attributes of American culture and make Cincinnati more like Cancun and Rio. The end game of Agenda 21 that is intended to take place over many generations is to destroy the infrastructure of suburbia and force residents back into the cities. The sinister aims at work are not ones of direct power from people like George Soros in his generation, but the larger aim of surrender to global collectivism where the human body is but a cell in the body of the Earth, which is considered the highest form of existence.
In my community of Liberty Twp one of my favorite Trustees David Kern finds himself voting in favor of a massive apartment complex at the new Carriage Hill development because members of the Vision Committee years ago approved the development. Developers are happy to make money off the Vision Committee’s idea, but what nobody knows is that the Vision Committee created their land use plan with a commitment to Agenda 21. Since most people think only in terms of their generation and not the collective salvation of collectivists who attend the Earth Summit in Rio, they don’t know that the intent behind the luxury apartments at Carriage Hill are to be Section 8 housing 50 years from now, and as taxes push people out of their homes in the suburbs they will retreat to those Section 8 homes as they lose their homes. Once they get used to that style of living they will crave the same kind of home centralized in Cincinnati near public transportation like what the Street Car is offering. When Mayor Mallory used the Delphi Technique mentioned in the video above, to achieve passage of the Street Car even with all the opposition, it wasn’t because Mallory wanted to build a legacy for himself; it is because of his collective commitment to Agenda 21. Fifty years from now when all the United Nations plans for the Twenty First Century are put in place, the suburbs of America will look like the green space outside of Cancun and all the residents will be stacked like insects in the apartment slums of Cincinnati not out of convenience to make life for the human being a good one, but out of a sacrifice to preserve Mother Earth. When Liberty Township Zoning Administrator Jon West says to my good friend Cathy Dirr who is the loudest voice in Southern Ohio against Agenda 21 that “you can’t stop progress, Cathy,” he is saying that the progress of Agenda 21 and its commitment to Mother Earth is more important than the happiness and sovereignty of the individual citizens of Liberty Township. By the time those new apartments being built at Carriage Hill–the Homearoma community in 2013–becomes Section 8 housing in 2040 the developers will long be dead and their children will have squandered all the money they made on the present real estate deals. But Agenda 21 will just be kicking in and those same children will be pushed out of the suburbs and back into the city where the prying eyes of government can control and regulate their lives with the kind of imprisonment that one can see in present day Cancun.
In Cancun nobody is rich, but the organized crime organizations who own everything. The same with Rio de Janeiro, but Hollywood has taken part in selling the Agenda 21 dream to the world with films like Blame it on Rio and the Mickey Roark film Wild Orchid. To the soundtrack of Ofra Haza’s sexy Egyptian music, the sex in Rio during Wild Orchid was the fantasy of most men and women and the result has been a massive influx of spring breakers who have fled the control of their liberal college institutions in America for destinations abroad where commitment to Mother Earth takes priority over human lifetimes and morality. Thousands of young people fill the hotels of Rio and Cancun as they have become the premier spring break destinations where they indulge in the loose rules of sexual conduct and make fools of themselves forever drowning their morality on the beaches of those resort cities. As adults they will remember their shame and pour their redemption into collective salvation by sacrificing their lives for Mother Earth. The plan of Agenda 21 is there in the financing of those particular films most recently exhibited in the Fast and Furious film titled the Fast Five, which featured street racing in Rio.
The pattern and commitment to Agenda 21 can best be seen in the 1973 film Soylent Green. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soylent_Green The investment of the culture into youth can be tragically seen and the result for the elderly who are killed and eaten by the youth once the reach the decided upon age for death is the end game for Agenda 21. It may not be the intention during the Earth Summits, but it will be the result. After all, that is what Soylent Green is, the chopped up bodies of the dead elderly of society who are fed to the youth as a sacrifice similar to the commitment of all collectivists into the surrendering of their lives to the benefit of Mother Earth. Agenda 21 is so embedded in our culture that conservative trustees and country commissioners have been voting in favor of its implementation for decades without even knowing it. Agenda 21 was there in the movie Soylent Green, it was there in Blame it on Rio, Wild Orchid, and The Fast Five. It was there when travel agencies created the incentives to lure young people from American colleges to spend spring break in Cancun to have crazy sex on the beaches like they saw in movies under the watchful eyes of Mexicans with machine guns patrolling the beaches at night and watching in delight. The bulge in their pants is not from the clips of .223 ammunition designated for their machine guns.
Part of the Agenda 21 strategy is to get people to finance their own demise. Uncontrollable development will make a few developers wealthy such as in the Liberty Twp case of the Carriage Hill Apartments, but everyone else will suffer. But in the far away land of Rio and Cancun the plans were created long ago to use the greed and short-sightedness of the average American to drive them like cattle to the slaughter-house of their own culture. The end game is the city of Cancun and Rio where the tinsel looks impressive right off the airplane quickly degrades just under the blankets of society’s view. While dining in an upscale Mexican restaurant in Cancun my wife and I spoke a bit with our waiter, a nice Mexican man who said yes senior and yes senorita at the end of every sentence in his dialogue with us. At first site we thought he was just like us, that he lived in a decent home, had a decent family, had a decent car to drive—access to iPods and Xbox games and watched football on Sunday afternoons in the autumn. But as we spoke to the man deeply, more than he was used to, he revealed after fifteen minutes of conversation that his brother had been recently killed by gang violence in the living quarters outside the tourist district. He lived in a card board box. His wife worked at the Sex Mall outside the airport and his children had all disappeared. The epic peril of his story immediately alarmed us that he was using a typical tourist scam on us hoping for a good tip, but his body language and demeanor was one of honesty. He was barely hanging onto life, and had little incentive to proceed from one day to the next. Looking at him I thought of the movie Soylent Green where the elderly actually looked forward to their death because the toil of their lives would soon be over with pleasant music and comfortable settings not experienced in their day-to-day living. In that man’s face I saw the result of Agenda 21 and the future of not only Cincinnati but every city in America. If Agenda 21 is left unchecked the future of all our children can be seen in the lives of the current residents of Rio and Cancun. The plans made by The United Nations are made in those cities for the results of the current inhabitants, and the results are not good for the human race.
Without question zoning administrators like Jon West in Liberty Twp will roll their eyes at the presentation shown above by Bob Silliman and regard them as the frightened antics of an elderly man. Community administrators like West are so entrenched through the Delphi Technique to the practices of Agenda 21 that they are not able to see the big picture beyond the advancement of their own careers—and that is part of the United Nations strategy that is discussed at Earth Summits every year since 1992. They count on human beings to be too short-sighted to see the whole picture, and in America people like Bob Silliman who are elderly and no longer concerned for their social advancement can finally see these schemes for what they are. There is a clarity in old age that people like Bob Silliman have that people like Jon West do not yet possess—and the truth is in the words expressed in Silliman’s presentation. Agenda 21 is a sinister aim for the human race, and wishes to end the American way of life. The situation is made even worse when it is realized that The United Nations uses American tax dollars to fund its own existence which is the joke at all these events in Rio and Cancun. Americans are funding their own end, and members of The United Nations are laughing about it as they gaze at the bronze bodies of topless women and string bikinis while sipping on their margaritas thinking of themselves as masters of the universe. They might even think that their sacrifice of the human race to the goddess Mother Earth be equivalent to the Mayan who sacrificed many human beings to the god Kukulcan which is the name of the main road that runs the strip of Cancun. The mind of these social collectivists and parasites to the human soul has the end game of the movie Soylent Green where future human beings will beg to be killed so their misery ends and they can become the food that feeds the human race and bring real value to their lives at last, as they spent a life time locked in an apartment living miserable lives of labor because of Agenda 21.
For a local example of organizations that most advance Agenda 21 in the Cincinnati area here is one:
They are the same group involved with the Street Car issue of Cincinnati and was hired by Lakota Schools to operate their “community conversations” which have not been cheap. They specialize in The Delphi Technique which anyone who has attended the meetings with Jeffery Stec at Citizens for Civic Renewal has learned. CLICK HERE to learn about The Delphi Technique and how it works. It is the same technique mentioned in the video of Bob Silliman.
I knew there was a reason I always liked Darryl Parks from 700 WLW. On his first Saturday show of December 2012 he offered an excellent reason why Kelsy Hartmann from Huber Heights—was caught having sex with one of her 16-year-old students in her husband’s car while pretending to do some last-minute shopping on the Wednesday before Thanksgiving. According to Kelsey’s latest evaluation she was an excellent teacher, leaving Darryl to conclude that Kelsey was simply doing what many other teachers have been doing in the competitive field of public education, and that is to personally reach out to their students to give them something unique that all the evolving education tools are doing better, such as the modern computer. One thing that a computer can’t do for young students is have intercourse with them to keep their interests so during these very difficult times when school budgets are shrinking, and work forces are being reduced teachers like Kelsey have determined to stay on top of their students–quite literally. Maestros de escuelas públicas de amor tener sexo con hombres jóvenes y chupar sus penes! No wonder so many parents support public education for their needy young sons. And no wonder so many students take to the streets to tear down the signs of tax opposition when school levies are attempted. The young boys of public education know they can’t get sex this easy anywhere else but in their classrooms, so they defend their sexually charged teachers with a fury. Check out the pictures of Kesley at Darryl’s blog posting, and then listen to his Saturday broadcast below.
I think Darryl is right; Rosetta Stone software has changed the field of foreign language education. In these modern times of 2012, it is rather easy to learn a foreign language should one wish to, completely invalidating the old archaic style performed in front of a classroom. The two years of mandatory high school foreign language education is absolutely out of date—because the modern computer does a much better job than a traditional teacher. So credit must be given to Kelsey and her barrage of other public school teachers and their labor unions all around Ohio who have tener mucho sexo con hombres jóvenes y tragar su semon en cantidades tales que los maestros beben su hombría por la taza con el café. And we thought teachers were drinking coffee in the morning……………………..apparently not.
A computer can teach young students in high school better than just about any teacher in any course these days—math, science, history and especially foreign language. Since most people learn by visual stimulation, the computer is much better equipped to perform most of the modern education tasks with far superior results than the traditional teacher, and the computer is a lot cheaper on labor too. But a computer will not steal the keys of her husband’s car and meet with students on the side of a road and have sex with them to keep their interest in public education like Kelsey and her other tri-state teachers will. That is the one thing the computer cannot do better, and that is actually provide such “hands on” training.
So whenever a school levy is voted for, and support for public education is declared, think of the over the top and under the covers antics of many fine teachers like Kelsey Hartmann and how dedicated to their students they truly are—so much so that they are willing to stay on top of their students needs—literally. Kelsey le encanta sentarse sobre el pene de sus alumnos en el asiento trasero de un coche. Auuuuhhh…………….public education at its finest.
If you ever wondered why your community is building sidewalks to nowhere, or cities seem hell-bent on constructing streetcars, or your local public school constantly uses terms like “global marketplace” and learning initiatives it is because your school, your city, and your community are following United Nations Agenda 21—and the goal of this diabolical scheme is foreign control of The United States with a gradual massive redistributive wealth plot spread across the entire world. In essence, the intention of Agenda 21 is designed to steal the wealth of America along with the tendency of freedom that only exists on the North American continent and replace it with a centrally controlled government functioning within the U.N. in Europe.
Agenda 21 has already been at work for over 20 years and it is only now that the intentions of robbing Americans of their freedoms are becoming evident. The strategy has been to gradually get Americans to accept government regulations they would otherwise reject by selling them little bits of goodness like parks and sidewalks in suburban areas so that trust will be earned in surrendering freedoms to a foreign entity, in this case a coalition of nations.
In my neighborhood of the ultra conservative Liberty Twp., Ohio Agenda 21 is showing up in the Vision Plan Committee as seen at the link below.
In the city of Cincinnati Agenda 21 is showing up in a program called Plan Cincinnati which can be seen here:
I know Roxanne Qualls personally and can state emphatically that she is an ultra political progressive along the lines of Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and Mayor Mallory—Obama’s personal buddy. When questioned about Agenda 21, people like Qualls will laugh about what a conspiracy such a thing is—and she believes she is on the high side of morality, and will attack anyone who thinks differently from her. For context, I once gave Roxanne Qualls while she was Mayor of Cincinnati in 1996 a t-shirt in her office stating “TAKE AN AXE TO OUR TAX” to encourage her to vote for tax decreases. She of course laughed at me—as predicted and thanked me for the shirt which I’m sure she threw away as soon as I left her office. For the rest of the contents of that meeting it found its way in fictional form into my novel Tail of the Dragon where Chet Watson speaks to Governor Royce. That scene was based on my discussion with Foxy Roxy the ultra progressive. She has been advocating Agenda 21 since it’s creation in 1992 whether or not she called it out by name.
Most of the time the advocates of Agenda 21 have no idea how the plan came into their minds—they just know they support it without question. This is the case of Karen Mantia the current superintendent of the Lakota School District. After many years as a teacher, and furthering her education to obtain a doctorate in the field of education, she had to run the minefield of Agenda 21 studies that were pounded into her head for two decades. People who are successful in education learn to say yes to Agenda 21. Outcasts who question it find themselves unemployed and on the outside looking in. So the higher the degree of study in modern-day university, the more committed to Agenda 21 they are. There are a few exceptions that I can think of right off-hand, but without fail, those exceptions have very strong families to help those students off-set the global oriented training that is provided in both public education and colleges. Many advocates of Agenda 21 accepted in their education days to blindly acknowledge such concepts and if they deny the teaching they either drop out of school to preserve their own ideas, or they fail their classes—because tolerance of other opinions is not what college is all about—or public education for that matter. In fact the goal of public education is not to inspire children to learn—but to teach children what social class they belong to—so that Agenda 21 can sort out the beneficial to their cause from the malcontents.
It is likely that many of the teachers employed under Lakota Superintendent Mantia as well as the school board have never heard of Agenda 21, because they see themselves as simple cogs in the wheel and do not question such things. Agenda 21 is a machine of many such wheels all connected to shafts that drive the machine in ways that each part of the machine seldom analyzes and this is how such things get advanced against the wishes of mankind—and how tyrants rise to power. Well-intentioned fools blindly follow the follies of some United Nations power grabber in a plot designed to rob America of freedom and wealth and distribute it to the entire world with a one world government superseding the elections held in The United States. That is the world these people are pushing for and it all starts with a sidewalk in your local community, to subtly gain the approval of the public through a very manipulative game designed to rob humanity of freedom in a naive preservation of Mother Earth.
Agenda 21 is in its simplest form an attack on American sovereignty without destroying the cash cow that supplies The United Nations with most of their funding and military might. The hope by these progressive insurrection artists is that a slow conversion in America from an individual based capitalist nation to a collective based managed economy ruled by Socialist International can occur without disrupting the global economy, much of it still at the mercy of The United States. The progressives themselves are collectivist oriented old hippies still trying to bring about the kind of world they imagined while they were experimenting with drugs in the 1960’s and 70’s, and they are a disgusting lot. The only places that such a world can be created under such impractical market values is in government where they can steal tax money to build the world of their distorted dreams—because all such thoughts would be snuffed out in the competition of the private sector. Progressives are the greatest threat to modern freedom, because they are selfless entities serving a collective idea centered around Agenda 21. If allowed to continue, within twenty years suburb living will be illegal, land will not be able to be purchased in any capacity, and all businesses will be collectively owned by the state—run by the United Nations. This is why progressives must be defeated in public education, local politics, state politics, labor unions, and environmental goof-ball organizations. We must get progressives out of our pockets and out of our lives otherwise they will never stop until they have taken every last liberty from America. It must be acknowledged that the national debt is part of this take over strategy because it takes away the power of the United States to manage their own affairs as a sovereign nation. Debt too is part of Agenda 21. So the threat is very, very real, and it is up to each and every American on how they deal with this crisis—because a crises it is. Ignoring Agenda 21 will not make it go away. Silently dismissing progressives won’t dull the knives they intend to stick in the heart of personal liberty. Playing nicely with those who think differently will only result in more loses to the radical left which is behind Agenda 21—even though it was George Bush Sr., who helped bring it to being in 1992. Without fighting for our freedoms, we will lose them to those who wish to sell freedoms away because they are not strong enough, or mature enough to handle their own individual lives responsibly. And the first of those yielded liberties evaporate with the construction of the community side-walk through a designated “green space,” and a school levy to maintain the power of progressive teacher unions. These evils begin there and must be dealt with as threats to life itself. There is no middle ground on this. The proof is all around us.
With the times that are coming it must be said that my advice to you dear reader is to get used to ignoring the laws created by half-baked politicians and scheming attorneys who impose their selfish maneuvers into public service. Speaking for myself, should the NDAA Act be called upon me or my family, the hides of the perpetrators will find themselves decorating the trees of my front yard. CLICK HERE TO REVIEW THE NDAA ACT. At some point people have to decide what kind of world they want to live in and if the political class no longer represents the core of the people who make up a country, changes must be made, and those who currently reside in power will not give it back until forced to either with violence, or the money runs out—which will then of course lead to violence from the riots that will take place much like what Europe is going through presently.
I am aware that my statement may sound radical to those who have not been paying attention, and my suggestion that my friends, family and neighbors should openly break the law seems insane. But before the news hits the wire that I went on some crazy rampage of law breaking, be it known that I placed my thoughts about the balance between law and order, and the pursuit of freedom in my book Tail of the Dragon, which contains my opinion about the legal system’s merit, national and world-wide politics, and the rights of the individual to live a good life—and I will allow that book to speak on my behalf and support with much greater detail what I’m saying now.
Break the law—and do it openly. Shrug off the laws of politicians and their pages upon pages of regulations they produce and send them the message that their laws have no meaning. Buy radar detectors to cheat the speed limit, buy license plate frames that throw off speed camera detection, find ways to legally shelter your tax dollars from your local public school, find a way to work around the EPA and every other regulatory agencies. Find a way to break every law that restricts your freedom for the health of the liberty movement in America. Do it in the spirit of protecting you and your families from the “takers” so that the “makers” can live to produce again at some future time.
Ironically, I suspected that this time would come many years ago, and I know the question that will be asked next—what gives me the right to decide what right and wrong is? What gives me the right to decide what laws I’ll follow and which ones I’ll discard as worthless? If everyone does what I plan to do, the world will fall into anarchy and people will be killing each other for no good reason. Well, I examined this very issue in my 2004 book The Symposium of Justice—so before anyone claims that I am a crazed radical who does not have a right to drive too fast on the nation’s roads, or come and go where I please in any manner that I wish, or avoid corrosive taxes denying the needs of the many in protection of my self-interest, my thoughts are published in those two books and should settle the argument better than any court case, or media blitz that attempts to paint my future behavior in a negative way. The reason behind my actions is there in those books for all to read and cannot be edited by any spin masters in public relations, or online editors who might attempt to paint a picture of me that isn’t true. My true statements are copyrighted with the Library of Congress and cannot be altered easily.
I’ve been in every kind of trouble one can imagine, I know the court system, I know lawyers, I know politics, I know business, I know the darkest aspects of the human heart, and I know history—I know where we are headed and how difficult it will be—and I will not follow fools to that destination under the shackle of law. My family will not follow and I will take up arms with the intention that there is no retreat. And when that time happens, I will not allow my name to be smeared the way that Randy Weaver was at Ruby Ridge. CLICK HERE TO SEE ALL ABOUT THAT SITUATION. That is why I published my public statement not in a court of law, but in the books that live forever and are openly available to the public through Amazon.com and can by-pass the media that would attempt to paint me as a lunatic as we all suspect happens a lot to other untamables.
There comes a time when people have to decide what side they are on, because taking a neutral position is no longer possible. Pleading ignorance isn’t funny any longer. People must decide if they are social “makers” or social “takers” and the battle lines are drawn right there. I will not adhere to laws that are designed to create more social “takers” at the expense of the “makers.” I won’t do it any more, and when the “takers” come to extort my participation, there will be big trouble, because I will not yield.
So break some laws and feel good about it, the more of us that do such things the better. I would prefer if I wasn’t the only one, but I will proceed regardless of mutual participation. Talks of revolution are toothless unless there is a willingness to push back in some way, and America is on the cusp of another revolution. It would be wonderful if such a revolution could be done peacefully without death and violence—but I am beginning to doubt it. The personalities in modern government are not equipped to govern my life, and that is why I declare that laws should be openly broken as a rebellion against corrupt authority.
I do not feel that way about all government. It gives me great hope to see that Sharon Kennedy from my community recently ousted a former radical Ohio Supreme Court Judge in Columbus. Sharon was a former police officer, yet the FOP did not endorse her for the election in 2012. For anybody who has read the Ohio Constitution it is a good document that is even purer and liberty loving than the Federal Constitution, but it is ignored and manipulated by many greedy lawyers looking for a way to game the system, especially at the federal level. The battle of our day is the fight between judges like Sharon Kennedy at the state level and those appointed by presidents at the federal level. The federal government believes that they trump state law and seek at every turn to make their intentions known. I respect the law that Sharon Kennedy provides. I do not respect the law that comes out of Washington politics. That is where I draw the line.
So break the law and do it with American pride. Don’t make yourself a pawn to the chess players of life in politics. Fight back by rejecting their laws and letting them know that you think they are irrelevant. Do it for the good of the country, and for your own sanity. But if you don’t do it for any other reason, do it for your own sanity. Breaking unjust laws is healthy for the liberty movement. If liberty is the goal, then more laws is the enemy, and it is time to declare such things so with more than just talk.
Obviously too many people took communism for granted during, and after the Cold War. Because it is shocking how many wrong thinking people have bought into the communist philosophy of collectivism. The more that President Obama speaks, and the closer to Atlas Shrugged Part II comes to opening in movie theaters all over The United States, it becomes more and more obvious that radical collectivists such as the writer of the below article at The Guardian in the United Kingdom are terrified that those of us who do not want or need collectivism desire to cancel our subscriptions which would leave them lost in an ocean of politics without a paddle or pot to piss in.
Collectivists have performed the ultimate scam, they being completely dependent upon our efforts; have positioned themselves to be our slave drivers by simply using the kindness of our natures against us. The reason that author of The Guardian newspaper hates Ayn Rand so much, and presumes that she is the darling of the right-winged political movement in America, is because such collectivists fear that writers like Ayn Rand will wake up people to the scam communist advocates like that Guardian writer supports. So here is a lesson to those collectivist types, The Guardian does not represent my beliefs in any way. Barack Obama represents nothing of my political affiliation. CNN, MSNBC and all the prime time news stations do not represent my philosophic principles. In most cases, Fox News is too liberal for me. Yet the fools like that Guardian reporter would have people like me believe that I am in the minority, that I am wrong because I am not on the side with the most democratic support. The communists believed that if they dominated democracy with mass numbers, then they would earn the right to rule over the bourgeois with a dictatorship of the preliterate. They call people like me evil for not wanting to spend my entire life sacrificing on their behalf. That is the meaning of The Guardian article, and all those who criticize with such fury the author Ayn Rand.
Those people do not represent me, those communist/progressive political advocates who hide themselves in the Labour Parties under seemingly legitimate politics, or in the media newsrooms taught by radical university professors with their pony tails and dandruff flakes fresh on their unwashed pot infested sweaters. What does represent my point of view, and millions who share my sentiments is stories like Atlas Shrugged, who just had their premier in Washington D.C. where the following clip was released to a hungry public. In the following clip, the message is the exact opposite of what the communists have been telling the world in their not so obvious attack on capitalism. But what those communists didn’t know was that people like me would take that attack personally. Some like me took it so personally that they have invested their life fortunes into the film version of Atlas Shrugged Part II in order to defend capitalism from the leeches of capitalism.
I would say that the most evil thing in the world–the least freedom oriented motive is the utterances from collectivists who have embedded their lives into mine. I resent deeply having to pay taxes toward organizations I find detestable. I find it appalling that I am forced to pay thousands of dollars each year off my property tax to keep a government school open that is run by a labor union I do not support, that teaches children values I don’t share. It is evil to compel my participation through force into such activity, because with collectivists’ attack on pure capitalism they have pulled my participation into their lives against my will. That is evil. If I do not pay my taxes, my property will be taken, which is forceful confiscation.
Collectivists have criticized Mitt Romney for evading his taxes by only giving 14% of what he made as a millionaire. What they fail to understand is that Romney’s 14% is a lot more than any village of workers if they contributed 100% of their entire paychecks for a year they still would not come close to the amount of money that Romney spent in taxes. Romney is called names for being a smart business man, for knowing how to avoid paying some of those looting taxes, because who says it’s good but the collectivist to pay taxes at the levels the collectivists set? The measure is created by collectivists. The implementation is done by collectivists. Only collectivists will call it evil for those who try to get a tax bargain, because it’s their system of communism that they wish for everyone else to be compelled to contribute. But if Romney doesn’t agree with the policies of welfare, the policies of big government, the way public education is taught, he is compelled by force to give money. The only defense he has is a “no” vote at the polls, or hiding his money in a tax shelter, because only a fool would pay their share of taxes deemed by looting politicians for mooching causes.
Out of all the entertainment that is available, not much of it reflects the viewpoints of people like me. Collectivist in their distorted mirror of viewing the world think that I am evil for not feeling compelled to provide a livelihood to the parasites of existence. But in my life, I do not ask others to live their lives on my behalf. I avoid such debts like any sane person would circumvent a deadly disease because to me, they are one in the same. I reject what collectivists determine is my “fair share” and I applaud anyone who avoids paying their taxes by $1. The person who avoids paying millions in taxes I consider a hero! Such a person has avoided the looting collectivists and put harm toward their parasitic ways and that makes them great. The collectivists who call people like me names for wanting nothing to do with their bloodsucking lives are not my friends and they do not share my values.
But authors like Ayn Rand do, along with film makers like Harmon Kaslow, John Aglialoro and Christopher Nolan. They do represent my values. And those values are not evil or even decadent because they are not widely accepted by a class of parasitic people who proclaim that they cannot live their lives without my assistance, compelling me to waste parts of my life on their lives because they don’t understand the value of living. Collectivists are like people caught in quicksand and they wiggle and move grabbing onto anything that’s stable determined to drag others under just so they can save themselves. They get themselves into all kinds of trouble all on their own yet they expect others to save their lives with our own, and call us evil for desiring to leave them stuck. Collectivists expect others to spend their lives helping them out of the quicksand of their own making, which to me is a deplorable evil.
It’s evil to me because every day of life is precious. I enjoy every single second of every single day, and I seldom ever waste my time. I could have 1 million years of life and I would never be bored for one single second of any single day in that entire span of time, because life is meant to be lived, and loved. And I resent when collectivists attempt to hold me up, or waste my time with their trivia, and expect to take my money when I worked hard to make it. It is evil because they stole away the time it took for me to earn my money with my time. The collectivist is evil because they willingly steal from me to serve their valueless needs that are infinite in their expectations. Atlas Shrugged is not a movie designed for collectivists. It is a movie intended to be enjoyed by individualists. Communists will hate it. Communists will call it names. Communists will attempt to keep people from seeing the film with the same vigor that they put up the Iron Curtain to keep their own people from seeing any hints of light from capitalist countries, so they could manage to keep their own people in the dark and loyal to their party rule. Communists who hate Ayn Rand are like an insecure husband who is ugly beyond belief but is married to a beautiful woman, desiring to keep the woman locked up in his bedroom so she cannot see what an ugly fool he truly is, because he knows his wife will leave him for something better if she sees it. Atlas Shrugged is the “other” choice, and collectivists know that if people see it for themselves, that they will eventually feel the way I do, and desire to be left along, to pay the fewest taxes possible and to live life separately from the masses who cast themselves recklessly into the quick sands of life. I am happy, and proud that finally a movie that speaks to people like me has found its way into movie theaters and I will go see Atlas Shrugged Part II multiple times just because I can, and because it angers people like Barack Obama and the writers at The Guardian.
Join me on October 12th to see Atlas Shrugged Part II. Click here to find a theater near you!
Visit the Official Atlas Shrugged Movie Web Site!
If you like my work at this site then check out my books shown below, along with quotes, interviews, reviews, and ways to find them. Clicking the pictures below are your doors to even more adventure:
I found it surprising that my congressman Speaker Boehner is not up to speed that the Muslim Brotherhood has infiltrated our government. He along with others appear to be in denial that Muslim extremists are tied very close to progressive politics and are determined to destroy America from within. So to bring Speaker Boehner and many others up to speed on information they may not have had time, or the political stomach to comprehend I am offering a series of radio interviews to watch below. The first is from my personal friend Matt Clark in Ann Arbor, Michigan on WAAM radio where he begins to peel back the layers of just how serious the situation really is.
Speaker Boehner and Senator John McCain has threatened Representative Michelle Bachman that they will remover he seat on the Intelligence Committee if she does not apologize to Anthony Wiener’s wife for a letter Bachman wrote questioning Huma Abedin’s parents ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. Anthony Wiener was the former combative progressive congressman who had to leave his seat because he got caught tweeting pictures of his actual wiener to women on the internet. His wife is a Muslim who is a direct aid to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Below, Glenn Beck sets the stage on how much of a storm was created by Michelle Bachman’s simple letter.
Where there is much anger over seemingly trivial issues, there is fire that nobody knew was burning. Whatever deals have been made between network heads and politics are not deals that are conducive to the American population if radicals wish to sing our nation to sleep with siren songs of peace while sharpening their swords on our chins. I would find it hard to believe that Speaker Boehner is on the direct call list of the Muslim Brotherhood. Rather, I would think that he believes he’s playing by the rules of politics. Unfortunately, those rules have been quietly established by those same Muslim infiltrators.
Playing nice politics will not lead America to victory which is what I think politicians like Boehner and McCain believe they are doing. They believe they should take the high road and not subscribe to wild theories. I believe they are simply naïve. But Michelle Bachman as a member of the Intelligence Committee has an obligation to defend the Constitution from enemies both foreign and domestic, and she is up in arms that known terrorists have been flown to The White House on the tax payer dime to meet directly with the President while she is being attacked from members of her own party for calling attention to the issue.
It is difficult to look at aspects of our friendships and political connections and assess the true value. Not the value we wish it to be, but the actual value. When a man wishes to sleep with a woman just for the sex of it, he might tell her he loves her, he might wine and dine her, he might buy her nice jewelry, but once the man has obtained his sex, the true nature of the relationship will be revealed. The woman may wish to believe the man loved her, but the reality is all he wanted was sex. In the case of the Muslim Brotherhood, they are very pleasant and say all the right things to the people they come into contact with. Members of the American government have been seduced by the charming Muslim Brotherhood radicals.
To people on the outside we can see clearly what’s happening. We don’t care if Weiner’s wife is the friend of John McCain. John may be letting his desire to believe his dear friend is completely clean and wants to be his friend because she genuinely likes him, taint his judgment. Other politicians who have similar friendships with Muslim Brotherhood members no doubt believe they are dealing with friends. But remember the story about the man who only wants to get a woman in bed, and once he does, the relationship goes downhill, and the woman will often find herself on the outside looking in used and abused. The Muslim Brotherhood wants an end to the American way of life and they don’t care how they bring it about. Like the man who simply wants sex, the Muslim Brotherhood will say and do anything to achieve their objective. It is the politicians who find themselves the targets of affection as their social simplicity leaves them defenseless against such charms.
I would suggest that Speaker Boehner not take for granted the evidence that is all around him. And he should not side himself against Bachman who is simply trying to do the right thing which her seat mandates. Playing politics plays into the plans of the Muslim Brotherhood. They count on such predictable behavior to launch their agenda against a sleepy society. But not everyone is asleep. And Speaker Boehner, it’s time to wake up and see things for what they are. These are not peaceful times conducted by peaceful people. And the Muslim Brotherhood is not your friend. All they want from you is your head on a pike, and they will do it the moment they get a turned back, and an open moment.