Insults from the Cast of Hamilton: Why liberal thinking is a form of mental illness

It was horrendous that the cast of the Broadway play, Hamilton felt compelled to dress down newly elected Mike Pence while attending on Friday November 18th.  Pence was just looking for a night out and was trying to enjoy a play on Broadway like everyone else, yet because he is now a member of the White House, progressives in New York felt “entitled to lecture the man from Indiana on how he should govern in the years to come.

The Hamilton stage play has become a success story on Broadway and I’ve thought that it was a good thing.  After all, what could be wrong with telling a story about the Founding Fathers told in a modern way with rap songs and a very diverse set of cast members?  I didn’t have a problem with it even though it was easily way too progressive for my taste.  However, when the play comes to Cincinnati’s Aronoff Center at some point, I probably would have gone to see it—because I don’t have a problem hearing from people on the other side of political thought.  I’m not a big fan of Alexander Hamilton as he was a Federalist in a big way, and I am of the mind reflective of the Jeffersonian Anti-Federalists.

I was born in a city named after Hamilton, but I am not fond of him as a Founding Father—so it tells me a lot that progressives in New York used him as a launching point for telling modern Broadway audiences about life after the Revolutionary War and how America was formed.  Notice in the clip below that the emphasis was placed on immigration which evoked claps from the audience which is a revisionist view point—because back then, everyone was an immigrant.  America wasn’t and isn’t a nation of diverse colors and genders—that is a progressive value—it is a nation united by ideas which exceed those terrestrial observations—and the producers of the play Hamilton obviously missed that element.  So now that they’ve chosen to lecture Mike Pence in the way they did, I certainly won’t be seeing that play at any point in the future.  I normally don’t propose boycotts—but in this case not giving those progressives from New York money is a vote against their product and that’s what I’d encourage you to do also dear reader.

Liberals are a hate group and after the election of 2016 they are out of power yet still feel as if they have a right to lecture the rest of us how we should view the world.  Yet anybody with any intelligence understands that liberalism is a form of mental illness because they put their values on things that don’t matter.  They tell conservatives to be color blind and to not discriminate on the sexes—yet they constantly hide behind color and sexism when the value of their ideas fall apart on the stage of public debate.  For instance, all week as Trump was putting together his cabinet positions the criticisms were loaded with an emphasis that it did not represent the “diversity” of the American people in a way that the play Hamilton does—or even modern Star Wars movies where white men are shown to be a minority and women and people of color are sprinkled about like candy on an ice cream cone.  Trump is clearly picking people who he thinks can do the job best and if women and people of color are in that mix—he’ll hire them.  But if they aren’t the best—he won’t.  For progressives, that is an incredibly difficult concept to understand—a rise through merit—otherwise known as a meritocracy.

Since progressives hate business and the art of making money they associate a “meritocracy” as being connected to a monarchy which most companies are to some extent.  That is why they are so terrified about a Donald Trump presidency because they fear they will be left behind in such a world—because their mode of elevating themselves has been through visual elements such as sex and skin color—not by being the best and brightest in their positions.  In that respect, they have reason to be fearful because in the world with Donald Trump as president, merit will be back in style—as it should be in American culture.  But Trump will not fancy himself as a monarch or a dictator.  As any good CEO of a company knows, it is best to surround yourself with people who are highly competent and you don’t want to put limits on their talents just to show that you are in command.  You want them to prosper and to be successful because they will continue to fight to make things better every day so long as there is a chance through merit to rise higher in their life.  That is why the best of our corporations are positive elements of our culture—not only do they produce wealth, but they elevate the lives of the people who work for them in ways that would have otherwise been unimaginable.

Progressives don’t understand this concept of working hard to get things—they expect to move through life under the premise introduced by Karl Marx, that we are all equal and deserve equal pay and that the goal of our society should be committed to leveling the playing field of everything.  The goal of progressives is additionally to make the “worker” equal to the “CEO,” which is of course preposterous.  Yet those are the foundations that progressives are committed to and those values are reflected in the play Hamilton with its emphasis on diversity and immigration—as opposed to the merit of the Founding Fathers to give rise to the concept of American exceptionalism.   To progressives what made America great is that it gave people of all backgrounds and sexes a safe harbor to reside in.  To conservatives what makes America great is a deeper concept, that people of all sexes and races despite their backgrounds can rise to the top and become whatever they want to be.  Progressives get the first part, but they miss the second because the philosophy they have built their foundations upon are limited to visual references and not the quality of the people who acquire good things in life through merit.

What the cast of Hamilton really fear is that their play won’t be so good if the values placed upon it are based on merit and not the progressive celebration of equality through diverse visual references.  That’s why I’m not going to drop $500 to $1000 for a box seat on Hamilton when it comes to Cincinnati.  It doesn’t represent my values as a conservative.  Those values have transcended visual elements like sex and skin color—I’m at a point in my life where those types of things just don’t contribute to my decision-making.  I care about the quality of people not what they look like.  So for that reason, I’m not going to support the Broadway play of Hamilton.  It might do well in progressive New York, but outside of that market I think they just doomed themselves to a larger market that might have otherwise given them a chance.  I certainly would have before they decided to lecture Mike Pence on a simple night out with his family.  But not anymore.  The premise of Hamilton was weak before this controversy, but now it’s just a piece of stupid progressive art that doesn’t represent the values of America—the kind of America that conservatives are fighting to restore from several generations of immature, purely visual progressives who have never understood the concept of value while they pretentiously felt compelled to lecture the rest of us on that topic.  Mike Pence was nice to sit there and be polite, but honestly, he didn’t need to.  Donald Trump was right to defend his VP.  It was tasteless on behalf of the Hamilton cast to do such a thing and they have what happens next coming because of their irresponsible actions.

Rich Hoffman

 CLIFFHANGER RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

Sign up for Second Call Defense here:  http://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707  Use my name to get added benefits.

IMG_0303

The Trump Brand: Making America Great Again starting at The White House

As I look at the electoral map of the last Presidential election, I see a lot of red. While the blue areas are high population density zones, they certainly don’t constitute a majority of the real estate within the United States, so it makes you wonder who in the world Rachel Maddow thinks her audience is on MSNBC when she had a melt down over the Trump family brand and how it will inevitably carry over into Donald Trump’s new role as President of the United States. America is a capitalist country which has made it the most powerful nation in the world and soon it will quickly outgrow communist China in GDP production because of a friendly pro business president in the White House. The evidence is that the Dow continued to close at record highs each day after the dust settled from the election results of 2016 as investors realized the lasting implication of a Donald Trump presidency. It’s OK and good to make money, and even to be rich. Excess is a wonderful thing and its back in fashion which will turn out to help everyone the world over. Yet progressives committed deeply to the name change philosophy of communism hate wealth, personal enrichment, and self-pride to the extent that they have dangerously stifled growth in America and that has been rejected quite spectacularly with the election of Donald Trump. So who does Maddow think her audience is?

I see the Trump presidency to the be the most positive thing that has ever happened to mankind. Reflecting back on history I think of the optimism that came from the Eisenhower administration which carried over into the early Kennedy years—until his assassination which plunged America suddenly into bitterness by the end of the 60s with communist insurgents dressed up as hippies on college campuses. Kennedy with his sheer optimism made NASA into a force to be reckoned with and took mankind to the moon. Trump is all about the power of positive thinking. In his Trump hotel in Las Vegas it says on the wall of the lobby, “If you’re going to think, it might as well be big,” which is from his bestselling book, The Art of the Deal.

As a bestselling author of at least 10 books on essentially the power of positive thinking it is stunning to consider what influence Trump will have on world markets especially within the United States with his message uttered from the White House. Kennedy had a fraction of that positive thinking ability likely undeveloped because of his youth, but Trump spews it like sweat from a champion athlete. I think that alone is the most exciting prospect of a Trump presidency. The residual effect of a champion of positive thinking speaking to the American people essentially every day.

Trump himself is like visiting Disney World—he is his own product of positive thinking and the reason the Trump brand has value is that people want to purchase a piece of it hoping to evoke the same fortune to themselves—even if it’s only a token of representation that one can look at on a shelf. When Ivanka or Melania sell jewelry it’s so that women can have a piece of the glamour represented by those two Trump women. From the Oval Office, the products of the Trump family bring people closer to the experience of the euphoria exhumed by President Trump—where anything is possible if only one can dream big enough to have it. That is precisely why Disney World has a special feeling once a visitor enters the property. The brand of Disney represents dreams coming true mixed with old fashioned American optimism. Trump as an organization represents possibility and reward and they have cultivated that image over several decades. Now as president, their Trump brand will escalate into a similar euphoric feeling when people see it even more than it has.

During the campaign at my house we bought some Trump gear from the official website, and I was quite surprised by the quality of them—extra steps had been taken to ensure that normal campaign apparel was certainly better than the typical paraphilia. My MAGA hat is actually a thing of beauty, it’s one of the best hats that I’ve ever had—it’s very well made. Trump over the years has nurtured that sense of quality in everything he does and that is now part of the Trump experience, whether it’s the Trump hotel in Chicago, Las Vegas or his buildings in New York. The Trump brand and everything that goes with them exhibits quality—and possibility. The Trump experience is a reward for hard work done and the euphoria of success. If you can afford a suite at a Trump hotel, you know as a customer that they appreciate you and they treat you as such. They do want your money, but the entire exchange is a mutual transfer of value that I’ve only otherwise seen at Disney World, or other Disney owned properties. Trump and Disney both sell the same type of brand—positive American philosophy rooted in financial reward.

Rachel Maddow and other progressives like her want men and women to assimilate into a blob of human flesh where the sexes no longer matter and primal urges are highly celebrated. They want money to be redistributed to the lazy and wish to halt the progress of mankind behind a new religion of “global warming” as a means to fulfil their destinies toward the age-old hindrance of the Vico Cycle taking us all back to a beginning of rule by theocracy and aristocracy after anarchy slaps down the hopes of human kind toward that progressive reversion to a world the elites know so well since it is a cycle that’s been repeated from the dawn of history. (See the great book Finnegan’s Wake for reference) To progressives human achievement is to be ridiculed and the money they make hated. So the Trump brand is something that melts them like a demon under the influence of Holy Water. The Trump brand alone is enough to rock America into an age of enlightenment unlike anything ever seen in its short history—and progressives know it—that’s why they are freaking out so epically.

Glenn Beck knows it too, I watched a truly pathetic interview with him on Anderson Cooper trying to be a voice of moderation toward the newly labeled “alt right” where progressives are outraged over the political advice of Steve Bannon and his professional access to a President Trump. For a man who once took on George Soros he clearly has yielded to the Soros power of manipulation over not only American politics, but also Europe.

Trump knowing Soros from the New York billionaires’ club is clearly sending a signal to his rivals of which Buffett is a part, that he now will command American policy shielding it with the Trump brand for its own good—and Beck found himself suddenly a diminished soul after the election. In the way that Karl Rove and Dick Morris were knocked out of political punditry for years after the Mitt Romney loss of 2012, Glenn Beck and his dwindling media empire has no choice but to crawl back to CNN, where he started, and reinvent himself as a progressive, hoping to be a voice against Trump the way he was a voice against George W. Bush. Because the “alt right,” otherwise known as John Wayne conservatives, hardly radical, have abandoned him.

And what is this “alt right” of what progressives call racists and xenophobes but people who behold the same type of values seen at Disney World—which Uncle Walt himself sold to America through his movies and television shows. Progressives have attempted to hijack the Disney Company with liberal micromanagement most evident recently in the Angelina Jolie film Maleficent where they re-wrote the story of Sleeping Beauty into a progressive mess of confusion making the villain the victim and the good the villain. It wasn’t the masculine prince of romantic love that awoke Sleeping Beauty, but now the villain herself out of love for her “adopted” daughter. The trend continued it the animated film Frozen where the sisters love transcended the romance of a suitor showing that Disney is attempting to plant the seeds toward less family value and more collective unification with the world of all sexes and races as their primary value system espoused in their motion picture projects. Young college kids growing up under this more progressive Disney Company were baffled when Donald Trump won the presidency because their progressive entertainment culture and progressive educations in public schools and colleges had not prepared them for such an experience. They thought the world was like what Rachel Maddow espoused—and the NBC network as a whole. But what all progressives learned on Election Night 2016 was that their sphere of influence was really only regulated to a few highly populated blue areas where illegal immigration and criminal conduct are most pronounced.

Then there is the debate about the Electoral College where progressive want to walk back the election results taking the presidency away from Donald Trump because Hillary Clinton won the popular vote. What progressive fail to realize is that it was illegal aliens who had not yet pledged their allegiance to America through the immigration process that gave her a lead over Trump. It was also convicted felons in Virginia given that right by her friend Terry McAuliffe to just squeak out a win in that state. Then there is the cheating that was recorded and the dead people who voted as reported by Project Veritas and suddenly Hillary didn’t do nearly as well as Democrats were suggesting. Trump easily beat her even with the Democratic cheating, and that is telling considering she had two American presidents campaigning for her, a current first lady, the entire media culture and most of the entertainment industry. She still lost—handedly. Once the smoke cleared, it wasn’t even close.

The Trump brand already represented a winning attitude before the Election of 2016. But now it will go down in history as one of the best brands in the world and people will want a piece of it. It’s only natural. Likely it will become bigger than the Disney brand and will last for hundreds of years and Donald Trump’s personal wealth will grow proportionally. But that’s not bad—it’s a very good thing—because that Trump brand will all by itself take America to a place it’s never been before through the sheer power of positive thinking.   And Trump hasn’t even done any of his policy work yet. People like Rachel Maddow and all those progressives like her are now a dying breed—thankfully, and they know it. People will flock to the jewelry of Ivanka and Melania Trump, they will spend fortunes in Trump hotels and golf courses, and they’ll buy Trump ties and anything they can get their hands on because they’ll want a piece of the American dream that Donald Trump has helped resurrect.

What progressives know is that their grip into American politics just came to an end—the Trump brand is enough to kill their manipulation of American culture. Branding allows people to invest in an idea created by something, whether it be the NFL, Disney or The Trump Organization. With Trump’s branding in place well before he was ever elected President he gives voters for the first time ever an opportunity to “invest” of themselves into what is going on at the White House making it the people’s house more than it has ever been. A few years from now there will be a lot to feel good about and people will be able to own a piece of that through Trump branding whether it is a hotel room in Chicago or a piece of jewelry from Ivana Trump. Or perhaps the same dress that Melania wore at a large event.   For the first time people will be able to invest into the culture of the White House and feel a part of it and that is the first step in making America feel good about itself once again. Branding is something that Donald Trump uniquely brings to politics which will have a uniting effect taking us all into positive, yet uncharted waters. Rachael Maddow realizes it.

All progressives do. Their branding through the media and Hollywood has been rejected by those vast red spaces on the American map, and they don’t have anything that can compete with Trump. Soros has had his day, Mark Cuban and the Silicon Valley billionaires are behind on branding and they can’t help the Democrats out now—so they are out of luck. Republicans now have Trump leading the party and through the branding that was in place for decades, people can join the Republican Party and feel good about participating in its successes, just like they do with their favorite football teams in the NFL. This is truly a new thing that will have a dramatic impact on the future of electoral maps. As Trump says the future belongs to the dreamers not the cynics and what his brand sells are dreams—a piece of inspiration that might carry one through to something greater. And those cynics—like Rachael Maddow and many others are part of a world that will be left behind.

Rich Hoffman

 CLIFFHANGER RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

Sign up for Second Call Defense here:  http://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707  Use my name to get added benefits.

 

Hillary Clinton and Child Pedophilia: Remember, Remember the Fifth of November

On this fifth of November 5, 2016 it is a national holiday for the people of the hacking group Anonymous—which is a kind of millennial rebellion.  I don’t agree with them on everything, or some of their methods, but they did some good work with the Steubenville rape case so I give them credit when they put an emphasis on a story.   As I was on the air at 1600 WAAM covering Matt Clark for his 1 PM radio show members of Anonymous were protesting in major cities all over the world.  They had a pretty crazy protest march in Washington D.C. which I noticed wasn’t getting any press

They also uploaded a file of collected evidence on the Hillary Clinton child pedophilia case that is building in the wake of the FBI and NYPD confiscation of Anthony Weiner’s computer which apparently contains links to sex with underage kids involving the Clintons.  The problem with covering such a thing is that the law is controlled by Washington politics in the Beltway and there are just too many high-level officials involved to get a fair shake in the media.  But NYPD officers who have seen the evidence are very unhappy and are looking to break the case loose so arrests can be made.  That prompted them to release the collection of evidence connecting Hillary Clinton to child pedophilia in the following data report.

The Clinton investigation is now connected to a massive child trafficking and pedophile sex ring operating within Washington, D.C. Over the next few days, and this November 5th, we will be referencing evidence and exposing the Clinton foundations for multiple incidences of child trafficking and sex scandals.

———————————————————————————————————–

Hillary Clinton is being investigated by the FBI for involvement in an elite Washington pedophile ring, according to veteran State Department official Steve Pieczenik. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12zVlaZyX3Q

Billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, his relationship with Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, Prince Andrew and other famous names, and their connection to a high-level sex scandal is exposed by Conchita and Cristina Sarnoff. http://bit.ly/2eH3ELq

Anthony Weiner Talking to FBI about underage Sex Island (Lolita)

The FBI wants to know everything about the Lolita Island that Jeffrey Epstein owns. Lucky for them Anthony Weiner knows a lot about the Underage sex Island that Bill Clinton would visit and Weiner is ready to Talk. http://bit.ly/2f4u9xv

Hillary has a LONG history of interest in Ms. Silsby. Wikileak emails dating back till at least 2001 have been found in her archives discussing Laura’s NGO. Laura had claimed she planned to build an orphanage in the Dominican Republic, but authorities in the country said she never submitted an application for this purpose. They instead located to Haiti.

Sources:

https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/10BUENOSAIRES166_a.html

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/3465

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/2772

The reason I give credence to this bizarre report is because of what I witnessed in the documentary film on Anthony Weiner called, Weiner.  It’s currently playing on Showtime if you’d like to see it.  In that film Huma Abedin’s reaction to her husband sexting other women on Twitter was strangely remote.  She seemed to care more about the run for mayor of New York than the fact that her husband had an obvious sex addiction problem.  The information didn’t seem unusual to her in the least as the documentary covered their life behind the scenes from their New York apartment.

Even when Weiner was recently caught sexting a 15-year-old girl Huma and Hillary Clinton were strangely silent on the behavior considering the close proximity that the sex pervert was for a person running for president of the United States. There does seem to be a secret veil that this Clinton group of people are hiding from us all in broad daylight and the only reason we don’t see it is because we think it’s too outrageous to be real.  But given the collection of information collected by Anonymous, perhaps it’s not.

This election isn’t just about the management of our country.  It’s about the fight between good and evil and as it seems quite evident—evil is deeply entrenched in Beltway culture.  At this point, before the election—it’s not too late to act.  But soon, it will be.   These are really bad people and none of them should be in any elected office.

Rich Hoffman

 CLIFFHANGER RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

Sign up for Second Call Defense here:  http://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707  Use my name to get added benefits.

The Top 100 WikiLeaks From Podesta: Making it easy to understand the vast depth of Hillary Clinton’s criminal empire

While on the air with Matt Clark during his radio show on WAAM in Ann Arbor, Michigan he covered the below list of the top 100 revelations from Podesta WikiLeaks and what we learned about Hillary Clinton and the people she surrounds herself with. This list is continuously updated and can be accessed at the end of the listing.  But the below list is quite bad enough taken as it was on October 29th 2016.  Just the first one about Obama lying regarding his knowledge of Hillary’s server is enough to cause major trouble—and the ones that follow are equally damaging.   At the link, there is much more detail for each of these headlines that can be referenced for authenticity and further research.  One of the problems with WikiLeaks is that there is just so much information that people are having a hard time digesting all the material.  So simplifying the vast information in this way should help.

Because of the vast information involved it is very difficult to browse the multitude of topics, so we’ve made it easy for you dear reader.  Knowing the truth possesses a lot of power.  Be sure to use that power wisely and begin your journey below.   What you will discover will be deeply disturbing.  Be sure to share it with a friend before they vote—especially before they make a mistake and vote for Hillary Clinton who has proven below that she has no business managing anything—especially the most powerful office in the world. After reading these, she should be put into a rubber room with a locked door—because she is incompetent even under the most optimistic appraisal of her actions.  At worst, she is a vile criminal running a vast empire of corrupt dealings that span the world over.  And she does not have the United States interests as her foremost thoughts.  That much is quite clear.

 

  1. Obama lied: he knew about Hillary’s secret server and wrote to her using a pseudonym, cover-up happened (intent to destroy evidence)
  2. Hillary Clinton dreams of completely “open trade and open borders”
  3. Hillary Clinton took money from and supported nations that she KNEW funded ISIS and terrorists

                     4.  Hillary has public positions on policy and her private ones

  1. Paying people to incite violence and unrest at Trump rallies
  2. Hillary’s campaign wants “unaware” and “compliant” citizens
  3. Top Hillary aides mock Catholics for their faith
  4. Hillary deleted her incriminating emails. State covered it up. Asked about using White House executive privilege to hide from Congress.
  5. Bribery: King of Morocco gives Clinton Foundation $12 million to have meeting with Hillary, 6 months later Morocco gets weapons 
  6. State Department tried to bribe FBI to un-classify Clinton emails (FBI docs)
  7. Latinos are “needy”. Latino outreach is “taco bowl engagement”
  8. Clinton campaign was in direct communication with DOJ regarding Hillary’s investigation
  9. Bill Clinton receives $1 million “birthday gift” from ISIS-funding Qatar while Hillary was SoS, Qatar receives arms flow increases of 1,482%
  10. Hillary campaign prays for shooters in news stories to be white
  11. Rigging the primaries against Bernie Sanders (DNC favored Hillary)
  12. Rigging the primaries against Bernie Sanders (Hillary’s team)
  13. Hillary was hateful, neglectful, above the law, “contemptuous” to her security detail, and “blatantly disregarded” security, (FBI docs)
  14. Clinton Foundation schemed with Big Pharma to keep the price of AIDS drugs high in America and cheaper generic versions out
  15. CNN leaked primary debate question to Hillary through head of DNC
  16. Democrats created fake Trump “grope under the meeting table” Craigslist employment ad in May 2016
  17. Hillary’s camp excited about a black teen’s murder (to help her agenda)
  18. Rigging media polls through oversampling
  19. Hillary is still privately against gay marriage
  20. Acknowledging radical Islam is a real threat and a “serious problem
  21. Admitting terrorists will infiltrate the Syrian refugee program
  22. Hillary sends U.S. intelligence and war plans to Podesta’s hacked email
  23. Hillary took money from foreigners for campaign (illegal)
  24. Hillary says climate change activists should “get a life”
  25. Hillary is pro-fracking, calls it “a gift”, despite what she publicly says
  26. Referring to a “Shadow Government” that protects Hillary (FBI docs)
  27. List of reporters that Hillary wined and dined, including biggest journalists and pundits of CNN, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, NY Times, and a lot more. Off the record.
  28. Democrats using American lobbyists to money launder foreign donations illegally
  29. The New York Times is colluding with Hillary, allowed quote edits
  30. Racist remarks about Blacks and Muslims
  31. Hillary’s poor health (collapsing, memory loss, drug research)
  32. Tipped off by the State Department regarding Benghazi emails
  33. Hillary’s staff admitting she is “tainted” and “really vulnerable” on corruption and bribery
  34. Hillary camp using “propaganda”
  35. Hillary Clinton bragged about being invited to Putin’s ‘Inner Sanctum’
  36. John Podesta’s password was p@ssw0rd
  37. Hillary Clinton had to be told when to smile during speeches
  38. Billionaire George Soros has influence over Hillary, ties to election fraud in systems used for U.S. voting
  39. Clinton campaign refuses to report sexual harassment (then forwards complaint to harasser)
  40. Admitting Hillary did not use private server for security reasons (shows intent)
  41. Hillary Clinton “doesn’t seem to know what planet we are all living in at the moment”
  42. Big media collusion email, working with reporters
  43. Using female senator to conjure fake sexist claims against Bernie
  44. Worried that Bernie supporters and younger women “hate her so  much (they) might even vote for a Republican”
  45. Hillary campaign caught partaking in insider trading (illegal)
  46. Clinton Foundation did not pay for the services they received
  47. Admitting Hillary failed foreign policy
  48. Admitting Obamacare isn’t working
  49. NBC colluding with the Clinton campaign
  50. Coordinating with SuperPACs, which is illegal
  51. Hillary’s team admitting she lies a lot
  52. Avoiding the press because of tough questions
  53. Plotting to attack Obama because “his father was a Muslim”
  54. Colluding over withholding Benghazi emails
  55. Hillary plans to support the TPP
  56. Clinton camp worried that Uranium One deal is being investigated (where Hillary sold 20% of America’s uranium to Russia)
  57. Entire “interview” with MSNBC’s Chris Hayes is staged, reading word-for-word
  58. Hillary Clinton stole furniture from the State Department (FBI docs)
  59. Hillary told Tim Kaine back in July 2015 he would be VP
  60. Hillary tweaks her policies based on donors’ wants
  61. Hillary camp admits it doesn’t support $15 minimum wage
  62. Illegally coordinating with Priorities USA, a SuperPAC funded by George Soros
  63. Racist and sexist remarks: “too white and too male”
  64. Podesta illegally has access to top-secret information
  65. Podesta connects to unsecure network where anyone could access classified files
  66. Hillary’s speechwriters: “I don’t mind the ‘backs of dead Americans’ because we need a bit of moral outrage.” (Benghazi)
  67. The AP colluding with the Hillary campaign
  68. Hillary’s camp says she has a “character problem” and is “arrogant”
  69. Staging fake anti-Trump protest, conspiring with Univision CEO
  70. Meeting to go over Cheryl Mills’ testimony
  71. Iran nuclear deal was “greatest appeasement since Chamberlain  gave Czechoslovakia to Hitler”
  72. Journalist talks strategy with Clinton staff and asks for permission to write article
  73. Bill Clinton admits Clinton Foundation has no “real projects”
  74. Violating campaign finance law
  75. Interfering with the 2008 Republican primary process
  76. Proof that ‘Correct the Record’ (SuperPAC) is directly coordinating with the Hillary campaign against federal campaign law
  77. Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg in direct contact with the Hillary campaign
  78. Hillary’s team working with hundreds of MSM news pundits
  79. Katy Perry is a puppet for Hillary Clinton
  80. Hillary tries to hide her tiny rallies
  81. Hillary had a mole working on Biden’s team
  82. John Oliver caught colluding with Hillary’s campaign
  83. Trouble with NBC so they call Chuck Todd to take care of it
  84. Politico’s Glenn Thrush colluding with Hillary’s campaign, admits to being a “hack”
  85. Hillary finds out more debate questions
  86. Hillary wants “successful business people” running for office because “they cannot be bought”
  87. “We are finishing up the next round of TV scripts”
  88. Hillary doesn’t write her own tweets, despite claiming “-H” means she does
  89. On Hillary: “we just keep giving her poll-tested lines that don’t work”
  90. Hillary extremely weak on topic of standing up to Wall Street
  91. “Even a clown like Ted Cruz” could beat her
  92. ‘The Huffington Post’ colluding with Hillary
  93. Clinton campaign memorizing their email cover-up script
  94. Heavy press collusion over Cuba and Hillary’s health
  95. Employment rate – They confirm what Trump says
  96. Obama picked people in his administration from the suggestion list of CiTi bank advisor/Wall St. shill

http://www.mostdamagingwikileaks.com/

Rich Hoffman

 CLIFFHANGER RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

Sign up for Second Call Defense here:  http://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707  Use my name to get added benefits.

How Trump Beat Hillary Clinton: The realities of a new kind of politics

It was pretty clear to me that while watching the Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton debate on September 26th 2016 that the New York billionaire won the debate.  The Donald maintained control throughout the entire debate negating the moderator Lester Holt and forcing Clinton to spend much of the event quiet with that stupid chipmunk awkward smile she uses when trying to rationalize through her various learned behaviors to evoke some level of confidence on topics she is uncomfortable with.  So it came as a shock to me that all the establishment types declared her the winner of the debate during the spin room conversations that took place afterwards.  Nobody with a sane mind could rationalize that Clinton had won the debate—yet most did evoking some invisible standard which the rest of the nation didn’t respect.  Online polls—not the most accurate—but ones that reflect direct passions of the electorate voted that Trump had won—handedly, while establishment media from all walks of life enjoyed the status quo performance of Hillary.  Likely their standard of success was that she didn’t pass out on stage because that would be the only measure of success that I’d give her.  The proof is in the debate highlights seen below where Trump clearly dominated with his performance. 

After the debate it was evident the Clintons hoped to work the VIPs in the room by shaking their hands.  Bill Clinton avoided the Trump family leaving them on the stage alone for several minutes.  I watched this with my tongue in my cheek because it was obvious they weren’t pleased with Hillary’s performance.  Usually the families mingle a bit showing the country that the election is bigger than the candidates—but that’s not how things ended on Monday night.  After a few minutes of the cold shoulder, Trump and his family left the stage for the spin room where Trump himself worked the media.  Hillary played the celebrity shaking hands with her sergeants hoping they would do that job for her.  While Trump was still giving his interview to Sean Hannity, Hillary and her husband Bill—carrying a beverage casually as if he just woke up at a hotel somewhere and was taking his time getting started in the morning—walked to the Econoline van that picked up the passed out Clinton from the 9/11 ceremony recently, and they left the debate facility rather quickly.  I thought it was a very interesting strategy for an unnaturally weak candidate.   Even though I don’t like Hillary Clinton or her family, even objectively thinking—she is just a weak person and can’t help coming across that way.  The more she talks, the worse she sounds, including in the debate. 

So it was stunning that so many establishment types declared her the winner.  Charles Krauthammer from Fox News declared it a draw—which seemed fair for him—but most others thought Hillary Clinton had won which left me scratching my head.  I have a great memory and during the entire debate I was pretty happy with the way Donald Trump asserted himself and literally handled the entire room with confidence.  He owned the stage by every account.  He controlled the pace of the discussion, and he controlled the topics.  He purposely didn’t go for the knockout because it had been decided it would be bad for a man of over 6 feet tall to slap around a little 5’ 4” elderly woman on stage which might actually bring her to physical harm—so Trump avoided the bait—looked presidential, and stayed on the high ground the best he could.  He defended all the sensitive areas well and avoided being pulled into a defensive position without getting himself out of it by the end of the segment. 

So what on earth were the establishment types looking at?  Clearly they were judging the performance based on a measure of static intellectualism which sought to protect itself from the dynamic force Trump represented and they had turned away everything he had said to protect their known reality.  It was a classic case similar to the woman who knows her husband is cheating on her, yet is afraid to disrupt their family income so chooses to ignore the facts to protect her livelihood.  Or the abused spouse married to an alcoholic that is afraid of the conflict that might occur by intervening in the destructive habit.  Hillary Clinton and her supporters—many in the media who have learned to live their entire adult lives under the destructive habits of establishment politics—and fear any changes to that system, are more than happy to preserve that system because they have some level of expected success they wouldn’t have any other way.  So they fight to preserve it even if that means ignoring some simple facts.

Hillary Clinton is a wounded animal representing a status quo political aristocracy that is being rejected—globally—and in the United States Trump showed that he was willing to take on that entire institution fearlessly and with mass charisma—and “they” hated him for it.  So they inserted “their” own static deductions hoping to ignore the dynamic force of change Trump represents.  They created a fictional outcome that simply did not exist at the debate—and time will show over the coming week that people will continue to choose Trump in the polls leaving her reeling from the competition.   Hillary Clinton spent over five days preparing for that debate and she needed a dominating performance which Trump denied her of.  She relied afterwards too much on the establishment media—which has been replaced by The Drudge Report, blogs like this one, and broadcasts like Infowars, leaving her without representation where it counts most in the 2016 election.  That is the reason Donald Trump has been surging to begin with—because the rules are now different and shockingly, the entire establishment ignored those rules in favor of some outdated engagement procedures which no longer have any relevance.

I think Trump won big and that isn’t just wishful thinking.  He achieved his objectives—but Hillary didn’t.  She didn’t show that Trump was unfit, or that she could outmaneuver him.  All she showed was that she could run out the clock and get out of the building with her skin still intact, which was what Trump wanted from the outset, to show that he had compassion for an old woman who is smaller and less powerful than he was.  In the aftermath, Trump’s online presence with potential voters far eclipsed Hillary Clinton leaving her to resort to old tricks about calling women names like “Miss Piggy” and other derogatory names—which in the minds of the typical sports bar attendee—is accurate assessments of various female embodiments—which actually leads credibility to Trump’s truth telling.  Just 12 hours after the conclusion of the debate Hillary was desperately grabbing for a life raft as the world around her had changed without her understanding—and she was truly lost.  With the amount of energy, she put into this first debate to get such sluggish results the path to victory just got a lot longer and more narrow—and for such a weakling as her—much more unachievable leaving the vision of her dreams dimming by the moment.  And if I didn’t hate her so much—I might feel sorry for her sorry ass.  But I don’t.  She’s a vile criminal who deserves all this and more—and then we have October and the surprises yet to come—and the gray clouds around her political future embroiled within them leading to a satisfying conclusion for those who hate her as much as I do. 

Rich Hoffman

 CLIFFHANGER RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

Sign up for Second Call Defense here:  http://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707  Use my name to get added benefits.

Four Minutes of Hillary Clinton: Remember the time she lied about being under sniper fire?

Forget the lipstick that was on her teeth during her DNC speech, forget the fact that she is a felon who illegally deleted over 30,000 emails from her private server to avoid a FBI investigation, forget that terrible screech that comes from her mouth when she tries to raise her voice—forget all that for a moment.  Forget that she cost four Americans their lives in Benghazi then lied about it to the families of the slain.  Let’s take a moment to look at her distant history—particularly when she lied about being fired at by snipers in Bosnia and how a reporter caught her on it.  See if you can take a test and watch this short little four-minute video and see if you can make it to the end.  Then ask yourself if you can take four years of her as president.

I already know your answer.  I feel the same way.  Be sure to send this article to an independent voter so that they can learn what you already know.  That lying, flop happy loser needs to be soundly defeated in November 2016 so that we can close her out of the book of politics—forever.

Rich Hoffman

 CLIFFHANGER RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

Sign up for Second Call Defense here:  http://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707  Use my name to get added benefits.

Trump’s Monstrous Press Conference: Getting into the face of the enemy–because it is a war

As I mentioned in a recent article on the upcoming Annie Oakley event, I am involved in a lot of things.  I have a lot of talents—and I know how to use them.  One of those talents is “political consulting,” which I do in a non invasive way–I don’t charge for it.  I get to go to an occasional VIP event and talk to people, but I don’t charge money—because to me we are in a war—it’s not a career move.  I do other things for money—but what I give to the war I think is cheapened by money.

I can’t help but think of the original generals of the Continental Army who often gave of their private fortunes to keep money in the pockets of their soldiers—and I expect the same of myself in this modern fight—which is more with words than bullets.  The very reason Benedict Arnold is considered a disgrace is because he traded his heroics with the rebels, to choose a woman and finance with the British which made him a dismal character in my book.  So I do a lot behind the scenes, and I don’t ask for anything for what I provide—strategically—except for those I give it to–to win.  And I have been saying for a long time what Republicans needed to do to win against Democrats—and few have listened.  Those that have, have won.  Those who haven’t listened experienced the same old lackluster results.  My basic premise has always been this, when you have the moral high ground—use it like a club over those who are intellectually, and morally deficient.  That is why I have been supporting Trump.  So it was enormously refreshing to see Donald Trump’s press conference on 7-27-2016.

It was a brilliant move by Trump, it sucked out all the air from Bill Clinton’s speech the night before and it aired precisely one hour after both President Obama and Vice President Joe Biden were on the morning shows slamming Trump on foreign affairs—anticipating that the Republican would honor the long-standing ceasefire during political conventions.  Trump didn’t honor that agreement, which is wonderful, and he opened up with both barrels at the stars of the Democratic Party—including Anthony Weiner who had just 12 hours prior was attempting to pick a fight with Donald Trump Jr., who emerged last week as a very capable potential political rival.  The Democrats really thought they’d get a chance to take some cheap shots without a response from the Republicans—as things have been in the past.  This is what I had to say on Twitter about Anthony Weiner—so it was great to see Trump defend his son quickly, and decisively.

You don’t win these things against vile people playing nice.  I will say it again whether we are talking about the presidency, governor races, mayor races, or school board candidates—you have to get into the face of the enemy and spook them into retreat.  And if you make threats be prepared to make good on them.  You cannot yield ground to the vile—because if you do, you empower them to rule over the rest of us—and that is why our republic is in the situation that it is in presently.  It is so good to see that Donald Trump has no problem attacking those he knows are intellectually crippled, and morally reprehensible—and that is a game changer.  That alone is something to get excited about, and believe me, I am.

Rich Hoffman

 CLIFFHANGER RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

Sign up for Second Call Defense here:  http://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707  Use my name to get added benefits.