It is quite stunning that more people don’t understand what Donald Trump is to the Republican nomination for President of the United States. Some of what I am about to say will require some additional information and review, so CLICK HERE for the start of that understanding, as well as all of the following hotlinks for further substantiation. The typical run for POTUS has established in the American electorate certain memorized hot points largely shaped by the media and the political class to always protect themselves from outside insurgents. Was I concerned that Donald Trump didn’t know the three primary functions of government with an answer “security, security, security” then further created a problem for himself by declaring that healthcare and education were the next priorities? No, I wasn’t. He gave a typical response of the everyday American who really hasn’t been a part of the political establishment—and has thrown money at politicians his whole life to purchase what he needs to get done to ensure his success. He gave a slightly better answer than the average businessman hanging out on a golf course. Does that make him out-of-touch? To people who spend their whole lives studying constitutional law, worshipping the integrity of past presidents like a king, and insisting on having a POTUS that rivals some European royalty—Donald Trump is a nightmare of bumbling irrational statements. But what I see is a down to earth guy who gets most of his information about the world the way the average cab driver does—and he’s clearly grounded—remarkably, untouched by pretension by being a “political insider.” To me, the weaknesses he is coming under fire for are his strengths. I want to see someone totally different in the POTUS role—and I want private sector influence instead of political experience. I want competent people managing the government, not a political class.
What Trump has that nobody else does is the ability to hire better people than him for a job, which is how he’s made most of his money. He has raw instincts about people who gives him tremendous leverage over someone like Ted Cruz. Cruz would be someone who Trump would hire for a staff position, but Cruz would never be in a position to identify and establish a similar criterion. Trump hires people, listens to them, and then formulates his objectives—so he doesn’t need to know all the details. He pays other people to do that. His job at the front of the train is to make important decisions at the proper time with the courage to actually do it. The current political order is stuck in a “static pattern” of what is considered normal behavior whereas Trump is mostly a “dynamic influence.” His very presence is changing the entire way that politics is run and those profiting off that “static pattern” are justifiably terrified of it—so they are throwing everything they have at Trump trying to drag him into their “static pattern” value system. Those static patterns consist of very rigid party guidelines on both sides—for Republicans, a calculated approach to abortion, a party established position on Israel, taxation, and healthcare. Essentially, the beliefs of the typical Republican candidate are formulated by the party instead of the actual beliefs of the candidate. Trump jumps into things, tests the water, listens to people then figures out what will work without thinking about any group affiliation. He is not prone to group assimilation which makes him far superior to any other offering.
The political establishment expects its presidential candidates to adopt a “static” position that they can then build a party around. Trump is so “dynamic” that things could change in a moment’s notice. Anybody who has witnessed any success in their life understands that one of the biggest attributes of success is a dynamic presence that can adapt quickly to changing circumstances and formulate them toward the original objectives. Politicians often can recite all the party positions but are statically welded to Capitol Hill politics and can seldom ever do anything that they promised on a campaign trail. So Trump figures, why waste time on things that might change completely within a year from now. It’s a pointless exercise. He knows what we need to do, and he has a track record of success—and he will find the right combination of resources to implement it. Genius can’t yet be plotted on a chart and no college has figured out how to teach it—so Donald Trump is something completely outside of their static understanding. That certainly isn’t his fault—it is the failure of the static system that we have all become addicted to.
That static system now to protect itself is looking at the statistics and noticing that there are a lot of people lacking a college degree that support Donald Trump and those same stats are not prevalent with other candidates. College trained people have a tendency to support static patterns because after four critical years in college learning what those patterns are right after high school, from the ages of 18 to 22—the final nail in the coffin for a lot of people is placed toward all future dynamic influences. I have been to college, my wife has to—I even spent a few years living on a college campus—and let me tell you dear reader, I hated it—because I am by nature a very dynamic personality. I relate to Trump because of that dynamism. To put it in terms that average people can understand think of the movie Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, which is a popular 80s film featuring Mathew Broderick, that most everyone understands. Ferris was an example of an extremely “dynamic” personality and he would likely grow up to become like a real life Donald Trump if he were allowed to be free enough to survive the static systems that imposed its will upon him. When I was a teenager, I was very much like the character of Ferris Bueller in that movie and I did impulsive things like he did all the time—and I always managed to come out on top no matter how dire the situation. People loved and hated Ferris Bueller for all the reasons that they love and hate Donald Trump. He doesn’t always know how or why something will work, Trump simply wakes up in the morning meaning to achieve success in whatever it is and he uses his dynamic personality to overtake whatever static imposition is in front of him.
So the reason that the people who lack college degrees—or those who live in rural areas support Trump is because they have not been conquered yet by the static pattern progressivism that has been imposed on college graduates and the urban settings which often force people to concede their natural desire for individual integrity. Nothing about Trump fits well into a debate format or the media driven talking points. He is best when he is clashing with static patterns with great dynamic authority and bravado. Trump has slipped a bit lately in the polling because he was trying to fit his personality to the static pattern of the Republican Party—as the head of it. He backed off the thrusters to show that he can be more “conciliatory.” But he shouldn’t, he needs to just do his thing and stay as dynamic and unpredictable as possible. If Cruz wants a debate, Trump should accept the challenge but to demand that it be done on ground he controls, such as Trump Tower’s lobby in New York. That way Cruz couldn’t say that Trump is chicken when in fact all Trump is concerned with is being pulled into the senseless static pattern of Cruz and the Republican Party which has actually given us all these problems. Cruz is a great debater, but his key weakness is that if he can be taken off his “Holy Roller” persona and beaten into submission with sheer force—especially in the surroundings of a person who has had actual success in life–Cruz could be embarrassed beyond recovery. The press conference with Carly and Cruz over the sex scandal showed a major weakness in the Cruz façade which will be exploited sooner or later.
But the trouble between Trump and everyone else is not that the billionaire is “stupid” or his supporters. It’s just that we know that Trump is a needed injection of dynamic persona that is desperately needed in our political system. Just as I’m hoping that Warren Davidson, my new congressman holds to his values when he gets to Capitol Hill, I have watched all this before and am always disappointed by the results. I stood shoulder to shoulder as a major supporter of Rob Portman when he ran for office. I knew him as a normal guy that would go out to eat with me after a debate. He blew it after years in Washington. And John Kasich went from a Tea Party darling to a softer version of Hillary Clinton. He is a major letdown. Actually, I could go on and on for quite some time naming politicians just like Ted Cruz that showed lots of promise when they were running—memorized all the things that the media wanted to hear, then turned around and was just a terrible representative. I don’t so much blame them as people—I blame the static nature of politics. It needs a major infusion of dynamism to change it forever.
Now that Trump has shown what’s possible, every celebrity who thinks they can will try running for president in the future. The party system is essentially over—and that is a good thing. Within the decade we will likely get stars like The Rock running for president and major rap artists who have the money and celebrity to gain media attraction on a daily basis. Four years ago Mitt Romney wouldn’t hardly go on any talk radio shows or cable shows—not even Bill O’Reilly—because he feared being knocked off message. He certainly wouldn’t do Chris Mathews—who is a flaming progressive. The whole abortion topic is something Romney and every other presidential candidate for the republicans would have avoided with diversionary tactics. Trump has forced all these candidates to do these shows to compete—because he is so confident himself—even when he steps in it—that he can find a way to come out smelling wonderful. That is why all these static pattern addicts hate Trump so much, but also why he has such strong support from an electorate that recognizes that the static system of politics that has nearly destroyed our country needs a major infusion of dynamic influence. Now that the dynamic influence has wrecked the previous static patterns—for both parties really—there is no going back. The Republicans either embrace Trump or they will get worse in 2020 and 2024. Celebrity will be the new criteria for better or worse.
The old methods of electing a POTUS have not been effective and America needs to develop something dynamically different. I’m not looking for a George Washington to lead me to some salvation. I don’t need an authority figure of any kind. All I need out of government is to manage the resources it takes to keep the country running and to stay the hell out of my way. I don’t need the government for much. I don’t even need their protection. Them standing between me and villains likely makes for a more civil society—which is good for most people, but I personally don’t need them—and I certainly don’t need a “leader.” I want a more dynamic government that isn’t afraid to sell capitalism to the world. Trump is the best candidate I have ever seen or heard of for that very dynamic job. Like Ferris Bueller, I know that Trump can wing his way through anything—and I want someone representing our Republic to the world who has that ability for a change. And I certainly don’t want a political party in charge behind the scenes. I’m ready for a major change, and for me Trump is it. Whether he makes it or not, politics is changed forever. So Republicans if they want to survive might as well embrace it. Failure to do so or to stick to the old static patterns will lead to their self-destruction.
Sign up for Second Call Defense here: http://www.secondcalldefense.org/?affiliate=20707 Use my name to get added benefits.